Of course!
Last week - Anxiously awaiting DNA results (that don't exist)
Yesterday - Anxiously awaiting DNA results (that don't exist). Later amended to not taking the report seriously.
What have they told their media outlet to print today?
They're no longer waiting on the DNA evidence because... they've seen a photo and decided it's not her!
WHAT?!?!
A photo of someone 4 years older is more reliable than DNA? Surely children change significantly between 3 & 8 years old?
Still, now that their legal action has been overlooked because of the sighting, the sighting is no longer required as a diversion. So looking at a photo will close this story as another dead end.
A photo that no-one has actually seen or traced...
